GeForce 6610 XL vs Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 FURY X and GeForce 6610 XL, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 FURY X
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
23.92
+10773%

R9 FURY X outperforms 6610 XL by a whopping 10773% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2261379
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.67no data
Power efficiency6.24no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameFijiNV43 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 November 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Wattno data
Texture fill rate268.83.200
Floating-point processing power8.602 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs2568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length191 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR3
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.33.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 FURY X 23.92
+10773%
6610 XL 0.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 FURY X 9579
+10785%
6610 XL 88

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.92 0.22
Recency 24 June 2015 14 November 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

R9 FURY X has a 10772.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 FURY X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6610 XL in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce 6610 XL
GeForce 6610 XL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 84 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate GeForce 6610 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 FURY X or GeForce 6610 XL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.