TITAN Xp vs Radeon R9 390 X2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated65
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.61
Power efficiencyno data13.93
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGrenadaGP102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 September 2015 (9 years ago)6 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603840
Core clock speed1000 MHz1405 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1582 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0379.7
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS12.15 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1426 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s547.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 6 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 250 Watt

TITAN Xp has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 132% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and TITAN Xp. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 4678 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or TITAN Xp, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.