Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Radeon R9 390 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGrenadaGT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2015 (9 years ago)11 November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560192
Core clock speed1000 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate160.038.53
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs16064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 150 Watt

R9 390 X2 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 4800 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 286.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 31 vote

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.