FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon R9 390 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGrenadaCapsaicin
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2015 (9 years ago)31 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1000 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0217.6
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 300 Watt

R9 390 X2 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 93.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Radeon R9 390 X2
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 31 vote

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.