RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs Radeon R9 370

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.73no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTrinidadAD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12809728
Core clock speed925 MHz1425 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate78.00643.0
Floating-point processing power2.496 TFLOPS41.15 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs80304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 120 Watt

R9 370 has 9.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 370 and RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 370 is a desktop card while RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 400 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.