GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon R9 370

Place in performance ranking	374	39
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.80	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Trinidad	GN21-X11
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$325	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	9728
Core clock speed	925 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	78.00	515.3
Floating-point performance	2,496 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 370 and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	221 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 370 12.23

RTX 4090 Mobile 54.61
+347%

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 370 by 347% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 370 5249

RTX 4090 Mobile 46191
+780%

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 370 by 780% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45 −287%	174 +287%
1440p	30−35 −347%	134 +347%
4K	18−20 −361%	83 +361%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

156

−317%

650−700
+317%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 −344%	400−450 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −326%	400−450 +326%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −331%	750−800 +331%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −329%	450−500 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	142 −323%	600−650 +323%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −325%	450−500 +325%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −317%	550−600 +317%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −335%	800−850 +335%
Hitman 3	168 −346%	750−800 +346%
Horizon Zero Dawn	354 −338%	1550−1600 +338%
Metro Exodus	130−140 −314%	550−600 +314%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −335%	500−550 +335%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	401 −336%	1750−1800 +336%
Watch Dogs: Legion	144 −317%	600−650 +317%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 −344%	400−450 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	187 −328%	800−850 +328%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −331%	750−800 +331%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −329%	450−500 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	136 −341%	600−650 +341%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −325%	450−500 +325%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −317%	550−600 +317%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −335%	800−850 +335%
Hitman 3	83 −322%	350−400 +322%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 −341%	1000−1050 +341%
Metro Exodus	73 −311%	300−310 +311%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −335%	500−550 +335%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	387 −339%	1700−1750 +339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	394 −344%	1750−1800 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −324%	500−550 +324%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 −344%	400−450 +344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	161 −335%	700−750 +335%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −329%	450−500 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	125 −340%	550−600 +340%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −325%	450−500 +325%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −335%	800−850 +335%
Horizon Zero Dawn	305 −343%	1350−1400 +343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	371 −345%	1650−1700 +345%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	204 −341%	900−950 +341%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120 −317%	500−550 +317%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−335%

500−550
+335%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −339%	500−550 +339%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −333%	550−600 +333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −343%	270−280 +343%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	128 −330%	550−600 +330%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 −302%	350−400 +302%
Cyberpunk 2077	95 −321%	400−450 +321%
Far Cry 5	152 −328%	650−700 +328%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −310%	500−550 +310%
Hitman 3	138 −335%	600−650 +335%
Horizon Zero Dawn	253 −335%	1100−1150 +335%
Metro Exodus	128 −330%	550−600 +330%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	297 −338%	1300−1350 +338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	164 −327%	700−750 +327%
Watch Dogs: Legion	109 −313%	450−500 +313%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
−326%

400−450

+326%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −333%	260−270 +333%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −340%	220−230 +340%
Hitman 3	45−50 −335%	200−210 +335%
Horizon Zero Dawn	129 −326%	550−600 +326%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	102 −341%	450−500 +341%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150 −333%	650−700 +333%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −339%	180−190 +339%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 −285%	300−310 +285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −321%	160−170 +321%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 −338%	210−220 +338%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −329%	150−160 +329%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −327%	350−400 +327%
Horizon Zero Dawn	149 −336%	650−700 +336%
Metro Exodus	102 −341%	450−500 +341%
Watch Dogs: Legion	69 −335%	300−310 +335%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
−334%

230−240

+334%

This is how R9 370 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 Mobile is 287% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 Mobile is 347% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 Mobile is 361% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.23	54.61
Recency	5 May 2015	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	150 Watt