GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon R9 295X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 295X2 and GeForce RTX 4090 D, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 295X2
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 500 Watt
22.31

RTX 4090 D outperforms R9 295X2 by a whopping 337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.3818.33
Power efficiency3.0915.89
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVesuviusAD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4090 D has 670% better value for money than R9 295X2.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores281614592
Core clock speedno data2280 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt425 Watt
Texture fill rate179.21,149
Floating-point processing power5.733 TFLOPS73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs64176
TMUs176456
Tensor Coresno data456
Ray Tracing Coresno data114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length307 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s1,008 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 295X2 22.31
RTX 4090 D 97.51
+337%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 295X2 8608
RTX 4090 D 37631
+337%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.31 97.51
Recency 29 April 2014 28 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 425 Watt

RTX 4090 D has a 337.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 295X2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 80 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.