FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon R9 295X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking248not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.41no data
Power efficiency3.11no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVesuviusCapsaicin
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)31 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $5,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28164096
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Boost clock speed1018 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate179.2217.6
Floating-point processing power5.733 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs176256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length307 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 300 Watt

R9 295X2 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 295X2 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 295X2 is a desktop card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 94 votes

Rate Radeon R9 295X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.