GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking313not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.58no data
Power efficiency6.31no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTongaG94B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179264
Core clock speed918 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate102.820.80
Floating-point processing power3.29 TFLOPS0.208 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length221 mm229 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.22x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.2.170N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 21 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 95 Watt

R9 285 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9600 GT Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 285 and GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 285
Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2
GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 76 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.