Playstation 3 RSX 40nm vs Radeon R9 280X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.57no data
Power efficiency4.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiRSX-CXD5302
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)4 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate128.013.20
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs12824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 4 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

R9 280X has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX 40nm, on the other hand, has 614.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280X and Playstation 3 RSX 40nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 280X is a desktop card while Playstation 3 RSX 40nm is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 40nm
Playstation 3 RSX 40nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 693 votes

Rate Radeon R9 280X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 40nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.