GeForce RTX 5090 vs Radeon R9 270X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking395not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.69no data
Power efficiency4.83no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCuracaoGB202
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)2025
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128021760
Core clock speedno data2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate84.001,714
Floating-point processing power2.688 TFLOPS109.7 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs80680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s1.52 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-10.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 500 Watt

R9 270X has 177.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 270X and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 743 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 326 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.