RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs Radeon R8 M365DX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R8 M365DX with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms R8 M365DX by a whopping 5241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 948 | 5 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.75 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Meso | AD102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 5 January 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 14080 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 2460 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 76,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 285 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 27.00 | 1,082 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.864 TFLOPS | 69.27 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 176 |
| TMUs | 24 | 440 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 440 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 110 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 864.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 13
−4900%
| 650−700
+4900%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−4900%
|
400−450
+4900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−4900%
|
600−650
+4900%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−4900%
|
400−450
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−4900%
|
400−450
+4900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−5194%
|
900−950
+5194%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
−4900%
|
300−310
+4900%
|
| World of Tanks | 44
−5241%
|
2350−2400
+5241%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−4900%
|
600−650
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−4900%
|
400−450
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−5194%
|
900−950
+5194%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−4900%
|
500−550
+4900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| World of Tanks | 10−11
−4900%
|
500−550
+4900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−4900%
|
300−310
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−5213%
|
850−900
+5213%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−5233%
|
800−850
+5233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−5233%
|
800−850
+5233%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−5213%
|
850−900
+5213%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
This is how R8 M365DX and RTX 5880 Ada Generation compete in popular games:
- RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 4900% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.63 | 87.06 |
| Recency | 3 June 2015 | 5 January 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 5880 Ada Generation has a 5241.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R8 M365DX in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R8 M365DX is a notebook card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
