GeForce 256 SDR vs Radeon R8 M365DX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking936not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMesoNV10 A3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)11 October 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed900 MHz120 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm220 nm
Texture fill rate27.000.48
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared143 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.144 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)7.0
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2015 11 October 1999
Chip lithography 28 nm 220 nm

R8 M365DX has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R8 M365DX and GeForce 256 SDR. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Radeon R8 M365DX
NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR
GeForce 256 SDR

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 8 votes

Rate Radeon R8 M365DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 81 vote

Rate GeForce 256 SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.