Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M520

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.98
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameOlandTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)2 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320896
Core clock speed1030 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6094.92
Floating-point processing powerno data3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 2 December 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 18 Watt

T500 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M520 and Quadro T500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M520 is a desktop card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M520
Radeon R7 M520
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 102 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.