Radeon 780M vs R7 M465

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M465 and Radeon 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M465
2016
2 GB DDR3
2.97

780M outperforms R7 M465 by a whopping 517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking781302
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Power efficiencyno data83.73
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTopazPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed1100 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00129.6
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M465 2.97
Radeon 780M 18.32
+517%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M465 1143
Radeon 780M 7060
+518%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M465 1740
Radeon 780M 7987
+359%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M465 12250
Radeon 780M 48112
+293%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−620%
36
+620%
1440p3−4
−567%
20
+567%
4K2−3
−550%
13
+550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−550%
39
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−417%
31
+417%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−513%
45−50
+513%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−667%
110−120
+667%
Hitman 3 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2000%
60−65
+2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−123%
85−90
+123%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−513%
45−50
+513%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−667%
110−120
+667%
Hitman 3 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2000%
60−65
+2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−350%
54
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−200%
40−45
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−123%
85−90
+123%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−283%
23
+283%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−667%
110−120
+667%
Hitman 3 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−141%
53
+141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−283%
46
+283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−107%
29
+107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+117%
18
−117%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−900%
20
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 24−27
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how R7 M465 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 620% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 780M is 567% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 780M is 550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 M465 is 117% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 780M is 2900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M465 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 60 tests (85%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.97 18.32
Recency 15 May 2016 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

Radeon 780M has a 516.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M465 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M465
Radeon R7 M465
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1547 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.