GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) vs Radeon R7 M445

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking838not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)no data
GPU code nameMesoNV11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201
Core clock speed780 MHzno data
Boost clock speed920 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate18.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit32 / 64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)DDR
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 2 Watt

R7 M445 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

2 Go (200 / 100), on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
NVIDIA GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)
GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 119 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 302 votes

Rate GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.