ATI FireGL T2-64S vs Radeon R7 M445

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking834not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameMesoRV350
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed780 MHz324 MHz
Boost clock speed920 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate18.401.296
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz203 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s6.496 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x LFH60

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.0no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R7 M445 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M445 and FireGL T2-64S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M445 is a notebook card while FireGL T2-64S is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
ATI FireGL T2-64S
FireGL T2-64S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 119 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL T2-64S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.