Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M380
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 M380 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T1200 Mobile outperforms R7 M380 by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 672 | 285 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 75.24 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | Tropo | TU117 |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 1024 |
Compute units | 10 | no data |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 915 MHz | 1425 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,500 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 18 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 36.60 | 91.20 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.171 TFLOPS | 2.918 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 16 | 32 |
TMUs | 40 | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
HD3D | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
ZeroCore | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 3.0 |
Vulkan | - | 1.2 |
Mantle | + | - |
CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 12−14
−383%
| 58
+383%
|
1440p | 7−8
−371%
| 33
+371%
|
4K | 18−20
−350%
| 81
+350%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−357%
|
30−35
+357%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−267%
|
40−45
+267%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−1075%
|
47
+1075%
|
Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−550%
|
65−70
+550%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−357%
|
30−35
+357%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−622%
|
65
+622%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
−342%
|
50−55
+342%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−373%
|
120−130
+373%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
−290%
|
35−40
+290%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
−107%
|
60
+107%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−382%
|
50−55
+382%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−269%
|
59
+269%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 40−45
−22.7%
|
54
+22.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−267%
|
40−45
+267%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−600%
|
28
+600%
|
Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−550%
|
65−70
+550%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−357%
|
30−35
+357%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−556%
|
59
+556%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
−342%
|
50−55
+342%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−373%
|
120−130
+373%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
−290%
|
35−40
+290%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
−62.1%
|
47
+62.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
−667%
|
65−70
+667%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−382%
|
50−55
+382%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−175%
|
44
+175%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−344%
|
71
+344%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 40−45
−6.8%
|
47
+6.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−267%
|
40−45
+267%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−425%
|
21
+425%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−357%
|
30−35
+357%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−522%
|
56
+522%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−373%
|
120−130
+373%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
−348%
|
130−140
+348%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 16−18
−338%
|
70−75
+338%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−131%
|
37
+131%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 40−45
+132%
|
19
−132%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−309%
|
45−50
+309%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−338%
|
35−40
+338%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−329%
|
30−33
+329%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−500%
|
12−14
+500%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−720%
|
41
+720%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−1486%
|
110−120
+1486%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 27−30
+125%
|
12
−125%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
−338%
|
35−40
+338%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Hitman 3 | 0−1 | 14−16 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−5050%
|
100−110
+5050%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−800%
|
27−30
+800%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 32
+0%
|
32
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
This is how R7 M380 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T1200 Mobile is 383% faster in 1080p
- T1200 Mobile is 371% faster in 1440p
- T1200 Mobile is 350% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 M380 is 132% faster.
- in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 5050% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R7 M380 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- T1200 Mobile is ahead in 46 tests (71%)
- there's a draw in 17 tests (26%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.32 | 19.43 |
Recency | 5 May 2015 | 12 April 2021 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
T1200 Mobile has a 349.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M380 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.