Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M380

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M380 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 M380
2015
4 GB DDR3
4.32

T1200 Mobile outperforms R7 M380 by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking669284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data74.72
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTropoTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed915 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate36.6091.20
Floating-point processing power1.171 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−383%
58
+383%
1440p7−8
−371%
33
+371%
4K18−20
−350%
81
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−267%
40−45
+267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1075%
47
+1075%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−622%
65
+622%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−373%
120−130
+373%
Hitman 3 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−107%
60
+107%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−382%
50−55
+382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−269%
59
+269%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−22.7%
54
+22.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−267%
40−45
+267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−600%
28
+600%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−556%
59
+556%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−342%
50−55
+342%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−373%
120−130
+373%
Hitman 3 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−62.1%
47
+62.1%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−667%
65−70
+667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−382%
50−55
+382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−175%
44
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−344%
71
+344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−6.8%
47
+6.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−267%
40−45
+267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−425%
21
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−522%
56
+522%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−373%
120−130
+373%
Hitman 3 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−131%
37
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+132%
19
−132%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−720%
41
+720%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1486%
110−120
+1486%
Hitman 3 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+125%
12
−125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Hitman 3 0−1 14−16
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 20−22

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how R7 M380 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 383% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 371% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 M380 is 132% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 5050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M380 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 46 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.32 19.42
Recency 5 May 2015 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

T1200 Mobile has a 349.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M380 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M380
Radeon R7 M380
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 135 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.