Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Radeon R7 M380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M380 with Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 M380
2015
4 GB DDR3
4.32

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms R7 M380 by a whopping 507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking669206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.65
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTropoTU106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402304
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed915 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate36.60198.7
Floating-point processing power1.171 TFLOPS6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M380 4.32
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.22
+507%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M380 1668
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+506%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−586%
96
+586%
4K14−16
−529%
88
+529%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−542%
77
+542%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−467%
65−70
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Hitman 3 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−518%
65−70
+518%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−456%
85−90
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−141%
100−110
+141%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−375%
55−60
+375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−760%
85−90
+760%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−467%
65−70
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Hitman 3 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−518%
65−70
+518%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−456%
85−90
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−250%
55−60
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−141%
100−110
+141%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−225%
39
+225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Hitman 3 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−456%
85−90
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−250%
56
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−141%
100−110
+141%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−518%
65−70
+518%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Hitman 3 9−10
−244%
30−35
+244%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−440%
50−55
+440%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1000%
30−35
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−441%
140−150
+441%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−450%
40−45
+450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 0−1 21−24
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−6600%
130−140
+6600%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 27−30

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 7−8
Far Cry 5 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1100%
35−40
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how R7 M380 and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 586% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 529% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 6600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 66 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.32 26.22
Recency 5 May 2015 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 506.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M380 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M380
Radeon R7 M380
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 271 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.