Quadro P620 vs Radeon R7 M380

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M380 with Quadro P620, including specs and performance data.

R7 M380
2015
4 GB DDR3
4.32

P620 outperforms R7 M380 by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking669464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.38
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTropoGP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speed915 MHz1443 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rate36.6046.18
Floating-point processing power1.171 TFLOPS1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M380 4.32
Quadro P620 9.42
+118%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M380 1668
Quadro P620 3635
+118%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−119%
46
+119%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−142%
60−65
+142%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−79.3%
50−55
+79.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−289%
35
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−244%
55
+244%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−38.6%
60−65
+38.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−142%
60−65
+142%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−79.3%
50−55
+79.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−211%
28
+211%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−38.6%
60−65
+38.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−142%
60−65
+142%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−79.3%
50−55
+79.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−38.6%
60−65
+38.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
Hitman 3 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−122%
60−65
+122%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hitman 3 0−1 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 7−8

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how R7 M380 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is 119% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 1850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is ahead in 66 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.32 9.42
Recency 5 May 2015 1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

R7 M380 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has a 118.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M380 is a notebook card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M380
Radeon R7 M380
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 606 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.