GeForce Go 6250 vs Radeon R7 M350
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 770 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.01 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | Meso | NV44 A2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 7 |
| Compute units | 6 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 75 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.36 | 1.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7795 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 2 |
| TMUs | 24 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 5.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 May 2015 | 1 February 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
R7 M350 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.
Go 6250, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M350 and GeForce Go 6250. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
