Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs R7 M265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M265 and Radeon RX 560X Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M265
2014
4 GB DDR3
1.41

RX 560X Mobile outperforms R7 M265 by a whopping 684% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking996419
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.27
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTopazPolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 May 2014 (10 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1202 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate23.5281.60
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x8no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1450 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s92.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync++
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M265 1.41
RX 560X Mobile 11.05
+684%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M265 6175
RX 560X Mobile 19829
+221%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M265 1882
RX 560X Mobile 8212
+336%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M265 1336
RX 560X Mobile 6329
+374%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M265 8402
RX 560X Mobile 35511
+323%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−162%
34
+162%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−475%
23
+475%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−317%
25
+317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−325%
17
+325%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1650%
35
+1650%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3533%
109
+3533%
Hitman 3 6−7
−300%
24
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2250%
47
+2250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−600%
56
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−717%
49
+717%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−275%
15
+275%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1350%
29
+1350%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−833%
28
+833%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3400%
105
+3400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−283%
23
+283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−425%
42
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−167%
16
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−950%
21
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1167%
38
+1167%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−363%
37
+363%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−100%
22
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+200%
11
−200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−12
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Hitman 3 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 5−6
Far Cry 5 0−1 6−7

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+0%
30
+0%
Battlefield 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how R7 M265 and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 560X Mobile is 162% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 M265 is 200% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 3533% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M265 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 560X Mobile is ahead in 48 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 11.05
Recency 20 May 2014 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

RX 560X Mobile has a 683.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M265 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M265
Radeon R7 M265
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 114 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 405 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.