HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R7 M260X

Place in the ranking	822	758
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	14.41
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	Opal	Kaby Lake GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2015 (8 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	192
Compute units	6	no data
Core clock speed	620 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	715 MHz	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.16	24.00
Floating-point processing power	0.5491 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	3
TMUs	24	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	-	+
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M260X 2.56

HD Graphics 630 3.10
+21.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M260X 986

HD Graphics 630 1197
+21.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 M260X 1903
+10.1%

HD Graphics 630 1729

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M260X 7640

HD Graphics 630 7685
+0.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 M260X 1396
+30.8%

HD Graphics 630 1067

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M260X 9034

HD Graphics 630 9715
+7.5%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R7 M260X 98071

HD Graphics 630 101178
+3.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14 +0%	14 +0%
4K	10−12 −30%	13 +30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +60%	5 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Battlefield 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −66.7%	20 +66.7%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −16.7%	7 +16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −9.1%	12 +9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −5.4%	35−40 +5.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Battlefield 5	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −25%	15 +25%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −100%	4 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −23.1%	16 +23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −5.4%	35−40 +5.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Hitman 3	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −5.4%	35−40 +5.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−33.3%

8−9
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how R7 M260X and HD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

A tie in 1080p
HD Graphics 630 is 30% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R7 M260X is 60% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 630 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R7 M260X is ahead in 1 test (2%)
HD Graphics 630 is ahead in 45 tests (78%)
there's a draw in 12 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.56	3.10
Recency	6 December 2015	1 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm

HD Graphics 630 has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M260X in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.