Quadro2 Go vs Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking886not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.96no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCarrizoNV11 B3
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 August 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data143 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2410 Million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.29
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data181 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.896 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)7.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2015 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R7 (Carrizo) has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and Quadro2 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Carrizo) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro2 Go is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
NVIDIA Quadro2 Go
Quadro2 Go

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro2 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.