GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 (Carrizo) with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.

R7 (Carrizo)
2015
12 Watt
1.98

GTX 1630 outperforms R7 (Carrizo) by a whopping 553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking900388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCarrizoTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2015 (9 years ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Boost clock speed800 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.12
Floating-point performanceno data1.828 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−536%
70−75
+536%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−529%
220−230
+529%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−543%
90−95
+543%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−529%
220−230
+529%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−529%
220−230
+529%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Hitman 3 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

This is how R7 (Carrizo) and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1630 is 536% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.98 12.92
Recency 4 June 2015 28 June 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 75 Watt

R7 (Carrizo) has 525% lower power consumption.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has a 552.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Carrizo) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1192 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.