RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon R7 A360

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 A360 with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

R7 A360
2015
2 GB DDR3
1.58

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms R7 A360 by a whopping 3316% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking96548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data52.86
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMesoAD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846144
Core clock speed1100 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00299.5
Floating-point processing power0.864 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs24192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s280.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 A360 1.58
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.97
+3316%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 A360 607
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20796
+3326%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.58 53.97
Recency 5 May 2015 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 3315.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 A360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 A360 is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 A360
Radeon R7 A360
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.