UHD Graphics P750 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and UHD Graphics P750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics P750 outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 782 | 664 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.84 |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Kaveri Spectre | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 14 January 2014 (11 years ago) | 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 83.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18
−33.3%
| 24−27
+33.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Atomic Heart | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Atomic Heart | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−41.3%
|
65−70
+41.3%
|
| Atomic Heart | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
−48.1%
|
80−85
+48.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 29
−37.9%
|
40−45
+37.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−41.3%
|
65−70
+41.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 26
−34.6%
|
35−40
+34.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−38.5%
|
18−20
+38.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
−33.3%
|
8−9
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−41.3%
|
65−70
+41.3%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−42.9%
|
30−33
+42.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−40%
|
35−40
+40%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−48.1%
|
40−45
+48.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−40%
|
7−8
+40%
|
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−31.3%
|
21−24
+31.3%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
This is how R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and UHD Graphics P750 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics P750 is 33% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.63 | 3.93 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
UHD Graphics P750 has a 49.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics P750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
