Tesla K20s vs Radeon R7 360 896SP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTobagoGK110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 June 2015 (9 years ago)18 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962496
Core clock speed1100 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate61.60119.6
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS2.87 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs56208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length183 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s208.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2015 18 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 225 Watt

R7 360 896SP has an age advantage of 2 years, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla K20s, on the other hand, has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 360 896SP and Tesla K20s. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 360 896SP is a desktop card while Tesla K20s is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
Radeon R7 360 896SP
NVIDIA Tesla K20s
Tesla K20s

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla K20s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.