GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs Radeon R7 350 Fake Card

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameOpalAD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2015 (9 years ago)10 June 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848448
Core clock speed1050 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors950 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate25.20689.0
Floating-point processing powerno data44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4.6 GB/s1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/s672.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 285 Watt

R7 350 Fake Card has 714.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 350 Fake Card and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.