Tegra 4i vs Radeon R7 265X OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameCuracaoTegra 4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)19 February 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed900 MHz660 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million11 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate74.001.320
Floating-point processing power2.368 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs802

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6ES 3.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 August 2014 19 February 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 20 Watt

R7 265X OEM has an age advantage of 1 year.

Tegra 4i, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 265X OEM and Tegra 4i. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265X OEM is a desktop card while Tegra 4i is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
Radeon R7 265X OEM
NVIDIA Tegra 4i
Tegra 4i

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265X OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.