Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs R7 260X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking506not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.57no data
Power efficiency4.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameBonaireVega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8963584
Core clock speedno data852 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate61.60224.0
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs56224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data945 MHz
Memory bandwidth104 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 230 Watt

R7 260X has 100% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 260X and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 260X is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 260X
Radeon R7 260X
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 393 votes

Rate Radeon R7 260X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.