GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs Radeon R7 250X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 250X and GeForce GTX 460 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R7 250X outperforms GTX 460 OEM by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 588 | 773 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.63 | no data |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | Cape Verde | GF104 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | reference | no data |
Release date | 13 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 11 October 2010 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 336 |
Core clock speed | no data | 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 38.00 | 36.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1.216 gflops | 0.8736 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | 210 mm |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | 3400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Eyefinity | + | - |
HDMI | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
CrossFire | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
DDMA audio | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | - | N/A |
CUDA | - | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 5.88 | 3.01 |
Recency | 13 February 2014 | 11 October 2010 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
R7 250X has a 95.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.
The Radeon R7 250X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 OEM in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.