Tesla M6 vs Radeon R7 250 OEM
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 312 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 9.01 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) |
| GPU code name | Oland | GM204 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 October 2013 (10 years ago) | 30 August 2015 (8 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | 2-slot | MXM Module |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | no data | 5.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 October 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
R7 250 OEM has 53.8% lower power consumption.
Tesla M6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250 OEM and Tesla M6. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 250 OEM is a desktop card while Tesla M6 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
