Radeon RX 6800 XT vs R6 (Mullins)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

R6 (Mullins)
2014
0.64

RX 6800 XT outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 10036% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118628
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.44
Power efficiencyno data15.04
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMullinsNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284608
Core clock speed500 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data648.0
Floating-point processing powerno data20.74 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R6 (Mullins) 0.64
RX 6800 XT 64.87
+10036%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R6 (Mullins) 2258
RX 6800 XT 193053
+8450%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R6 (Mullins) 20511
RX 6800 XT 504438
+2359%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−19700%
198
+19700%
1440p1−2
−13400%
135
+13400%
4K0−191

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3250%
130−140
+3250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15600%
150−160
+15600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2540%
132
+2540%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2082%
240−250
+2082%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4367%
260−270
+4367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−930%
309
+930%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3250%
130−140
+3250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15600%
150−160
+15600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2620%
136
+2620%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2082%
240−250
+2082%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5817%
355
+5817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1270%
130−140
+1270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−930%
309
+930%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3250%
130−140
+3250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2340%
122
+2340%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2436%
279
+2436%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4933%
302
+4933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1500%
160
+1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−273%
112
+273%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−10100%
100−110
+10100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7500%
75−80
+7500%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1800%
114
+1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−7067%
215
+7067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−31300%
314
+31300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3767%
116
+3767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5100%
50−55
+5100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3700%
76
+3700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 158
+0%
158
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+0%
122
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 135
+0%
135
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120
+0%
120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 98
+0%
98
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+0%
222
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hitman 3 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 126
+0%
126
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 133
+0%
133
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 49
+0%
49
+0%

This is how R6 (Mullins) and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 19700% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 13400% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 31300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 64.87
Recency 29 April 2014 28 October 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 6800 XT has a 10035.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R6 (Mullins) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3419 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.