UHD Graphics vs Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Place in the ranking	990	607
Place by popularity	not in top-100	5
Power efficiency	2.25	38.55
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	Stoney Ridge	Jasper Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	256
Core clock speed	no data	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	12-45 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	12.00
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−233%

30−35
+233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Elden Ring	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4 −250%	14−16 +250%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Metro Exodus	2 −250%	7−8 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Dota 2	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Elden Ring	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Fortnite	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20 −275%	75−80 +275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
World of Tanks	30−35 −255%	110−120 +255%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Dota 2	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Valorant	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Dota 2	16−18 −275%	60−65 +275%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Valorant	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

This is how R5 (Stoney Ridge) and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics is 233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.47	5.60
Recency	1 June 2016	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 281% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.