TITAN V CEO Edition vs Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) with TITAN V CEO Edition, including specs and performance data.

R5 (Stoney Ridge)
2016
12 Watt
1.45

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 2937% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking99684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeGV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speedno data1200 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data465.6
Floating-point performanceno data14.9 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1696 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data868.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−2900%
240−250
+2900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Far Cry 5 3
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 7
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Metro Exodus 7
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2930%
1000−1050
+2930%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2900%
240−250
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2930%
1000−1050
+2930%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2757%
400−450
+2757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2900%
240−250
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2930%
1000−1050
+2930%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

This is how R5 (Stoney Ridge) and TITAN V CEO Edition compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 2900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 44.03
Recency 1 June 2016 21 June 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 250 Watt

R5 (Stoney Ridge) has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

TITAN V CEO Edition, on the other hand, has a 2936.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 50 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.