GeForce2 Go 100 vs Radeon R5 M335

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1000not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameExoNV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date21 October 2015 (9 years ago)6 February 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed1070 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1070 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown2 Watt
Texture fill rate21.400.5
Floating-point processing power0.6848 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 127.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 October 2015 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R5 M335 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M335 and GeForce2 Go 100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M335
Radeon R5 M335
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 141 vote

Rate Radeon R5 M335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.