UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon R5 M330

Place in the ranking	971	661
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.86	20.56
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Exo	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	256
Compute units	5	no data
Core clock speed	955 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.60	20.80
Floating-point processing power	0.6592 TFLOPS	0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	20	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M330 1.54

UHD Graphics 750 4.50
+192%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M330 595

UHD Graphics 750 1733
+191%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−167%

24−27
+167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−150%

10−11

+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −29.4%	40−45 +29.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −29.4%	40−45 +29.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −29.4%	40−45 +29.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−300%

12−14
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −250%	27−30 +250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−100%

8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−200%

3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how R5 M330 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is 167% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 44 tests (75%)
there's a draw in 15 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.54	4.50
Recency	5 May 2015	30 March 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	15 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has a 192.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.