Quadro GV100 vs Radeon R5 M330

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M330 with Quadro GV100, including specs and performance data.

R5 M330
2015
4 GB DDR3, 18 Watt
1.54

GV100 outperforms R5 M330 by a whopping 3241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking97152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.65
Power efficiency5.8714.11
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameExoGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3205120
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed955 MHz1132 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1627 MHz
Number of transistors690 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60520.6
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS16.66 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs20320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz848 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s868.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M330 1.54
Quadro GV100 51.45
+3241%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M330 595
Quadro GV100 19824
+3232%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−3233%
300−350
+3233%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data30.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3233%
500−550
+3233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3150%
260−270
+3150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3135%
1100−1150
+3135%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3233%
500−550
+3233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3150%
260−270
+3150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−2977%
400−450
+2977%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3135%
1100−1150
+3135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−3233%
500−550
+3233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3150%
260−270
+3150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−3082%
350−400
+3082%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−3135%
1100−1150
+3135%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−3150%
260−270
+3150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

This is how R5 M330 and Quadro GV100 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 3233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 51.45
Recency 5 May 2015 27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 250 Watt

R5 M330 has 1288.9% lower power consumption.

Quadro GV100, on the other hand, has a 3240.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook card while Quadro GV100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 1028 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 53 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.