GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon R5 M315

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M315 with GeForce RTX 4090 D, including specs and performance data.

R5 M315
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.23

RTX 4090 D outperforms R5 M315 by a whopping 7528% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.64
Power efficiencyno data15.28
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMesoAD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)28 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38414592
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed970 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data425 Watt
Texture fill rate23.281,149
Floating-point processing power0.745 TFLOPS73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs8176
TMUs24456
Tensor Coresno data456
Ray Tracing Coresno data114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M315 1.23
RTX 4090 D 93.82
+7528%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M315 473
RTX 4090 D 36196
+7552%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−7400%
1050−1100
+7400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−7476%
2500−2550
+7476%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−7400%
1050−1100
+7400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−7173%
800−850
+7173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−7476%
2500−2550
+7476%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−7400%
1050−1100
+7400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−7173%
800−850
+7173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−7476%
2500−2550
+7476%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 93.82
Recency 5 May 2015 28 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 4090 D has a 7527.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M315 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M315 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M315
Radeon R5 M315
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 82 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.