ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX vs R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1086not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBeemaRV670
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128320
Core clock speedno data777 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.43
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4973 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR4
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1126 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72.06 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) has a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) and Radeon HD 2950 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2950 XTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
Radeon HD 2950 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2950 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.