ATI Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm vs Radeon R5 A320

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameJetXenos Vejle
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2015 (9 years ago)19 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320240
Core clock speed750 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million372 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data133 Watt
Texture fill rate16.508.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2 GB/s700 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)3.0
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

R5 A320 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 A320 and Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 A320 is a desktop card while Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 A320
Radeon R5 A320
ATI Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm
Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate Xbox 360 S GPU 45nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.