UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R3 (Mullins/Beema)
2014
0.84

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) outperforms R3 (Mullins/Beema) by a whopping 323% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1135719
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)no data
GPU code nameBeema/Mullinsno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12832
Core clock speed350 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Shared memory+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R3 (Mullins/Beema) 0.84
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 3.55
+323%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R3 (Mullins/Beema) 620
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 2612
+321%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R3 (Mullins/Beema) 1815
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 9462
+421%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R3 (Mullins/Beema) 420
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 1895
+352%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R3 (Mullins/Beema) 3049
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) 12687
+316%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+7.1%
14
−7.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 7−8
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 7−8
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 7−8
Hitman 3 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−114%
15
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−32.3%
40−45
+32.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 2−3

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how R3 (Mullins/Beema) and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:

  • R3 (Mullins/Beema) is 7% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R3 (Mullins/Beema) is 67% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R3 (Mullins/Beema) is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is ahead in 31 test (63%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 3.55

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has a 322.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.