Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics vs Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1135 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010) |
| GPU code name | Beema/Mullins | GMA HD |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 10 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 12 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 686 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 10 January 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
R3 (Mullins/Beema) has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
