UHD Graphics 730 vs Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
2014
0.65

UHD Graphics 730 outperforms R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) by a whopping 538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1183681
Place by popularitynot in top-10094
Power efficiencyno data19.21
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBeema/MullinsRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128192
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−533%
190−200
+533%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−533%
190−200
+533%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−533%
190−200
+533%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hitman 3 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 4.15
Recency 29 April 2014 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 730 has a 538.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1222 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.