Radeon Graphics vs R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
2014
0.65

Graphics outperforms R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1194898
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBeema/MullinsRenoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128448
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed600 MHz1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.00
Floating-point performanceno data1.344 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−200%
90−95
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 1.98
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Graphics has a 204.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5834 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.