RTX A4500 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

Place in the ranking	151	78
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	24.88	no data
Power efficiency	10.30	22.13
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Vega 10	GA104
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 August 2018 (6 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	5888
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	336.0	276.0
Floating-point processing power	10.75 TFLOPS	17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	224	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 34.40

RTX A4500 Mobile 45.00
+30.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 8200 13224

RTX A4500 Mobile 17300
+30.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Elden Ring	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Dota 2	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Elden Ring	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Dota 2	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Elden Ring	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
World of Tanks	280−290 +0%	280−290 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Dota 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Elden Ring	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Dota 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Fortnite	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.40	45.00
Recency	13 August 2018	22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	140 Watt

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 64.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.