Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Instinct MI25 Radeon Pro V320 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon PRO WX 9100 Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 8200
2018
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
34.80
+218%

Pro WX 8200 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 218% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 8200
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking146425
Place by popularitynot in top-10026
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.97no data
Power efficiency10.37no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358496
Core clock speed1200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate336.0no data
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs224no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.80 10.94
Recency 13 August 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Pro WX 8200 has a 218.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB RTX A2000 12 GB
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
Tesla P100 DGXS Tesla P100 DGXS
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
Pro 555X Radeon Pro 555X
vs
GT 650M Mac Edition GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
Pro 555X Radeon Pro 555X
vs
RX 570 X2 Radeon RX 570 X2
Pro 555X Radeon Pro 555X
vs
RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M
ATI V7760 FirePro V7760
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
R9 285X Radeon R9 285X
vs
RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE
RTX 2080 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
vs
Data Center GPU Max NEXT Data Center GPU Max NEXT
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
6150 SE + nForce 430 GeForce 6150 SE + nForce 430
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2549 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.