GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

Place in the ranking	277	287
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.01	27.28
Power efficiency	10.77	16.98
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	GP106
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	10 November 2016 (8 years ago)	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$237.11

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Mobile has 241% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1280
Core clock speed	1188 MHz	1506 MHz
Boost clock speed	1243 MHz	1708 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	94 °C
Texture fill rate	179.0	133.6
Floating-point processing power	5.728 TFLOPS	4.275 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	144	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	192 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDCP	-	2.2
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
GameStream	-	+
GPU Boost	no data	3.0
VR Ready	no data	+
Ansel	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	70−75 +2.9%	68 −2.9%
1440p	45−50 +2.3%	44 −2.3%
4K	30−35 +0%	30 +0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	11.41 −227%	3.49 +227%
1440p	17.76 −229%	5.39 +229%
4K	26.63 −237%	7.90 +237%

GTX 1060 Mobile has 227% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1060 Mobile has 229% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1060 Mobile has 237% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −11.1%	40 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +10.8%	37 −10.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +1.6%	63 −1.6%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +16.1%	31 −16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +28.1%	32 −28.1%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −23.3%	106 +23.3%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −24.1%	67 +24.1%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −25.5%	69 +25.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −57.4%	74 +57.4%
Valorant	80−85 −4.9%	86 +4.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −14.1%	73 +14.1%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +33.3%	27 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +57.7%	26 −57.7%
Dota 2	70−75 +46.9%	49 −46.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −4.5%	70 +4.5%
Fortnite	100−110 +13.8%	94 −13.8%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +7.5%	80 −7.5%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +31.7%	41 −31.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 −4.2%	74 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +12.2%	49 −12.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −50%	204 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +74.1%	27 −74.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −17.2%	75 +17.2%
Valorant	80−85 +54.7%	53 −54.7%
World of Tanks	230−240 +5.4%	222 −5.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +12.3%	57 −12.3%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +56.5%	23 −56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +78.3%	23 −78.3%
Dota 2	70−75 −63.9%	118 +63.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +1.5%	65−70 −1.5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +26.5%	68 −26.5%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +20%	45 −20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +147%	55 −147%
Valorant	80−85 +13.9%	72 −13.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +3.1%	30−35 −3.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +5.9%	17 −5.9%
World of Tanks	130−140 +3%	130−140 −3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −2.4%	42 +2.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +3.8%	50−55 −3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +3.9%	50−55 −3.9%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +2.2%	45 −2.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +3.6%	27−30 −3.6%
Valorant	50−55 +15.2%	46 −15.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +3%	30−35 −3%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +7.1%	14 −7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −4.9%	64 +4.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +18.2%	11 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +3%	30−35 −3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −10%	22 +10%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	35−40 +2.9%	30−35 −2.9%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +4%	24−27 −4%
Fortnite	24−27 −8.3%	26 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +3.4%	27−30 −3.4%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Valorant	24−27 +4.3%	23 −4.3%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and GTX 1060 Mobile compete in popular games:

Pro WX 7100 is 3% faster in 1080p
Pro WX 7100 is 2% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 147% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 64% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 42 tests (67%)
GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 16 tests (25%)
there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.41	18.84
Recency	10 November 2016	15 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1060 Mobile, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 7100 and GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.