Quadro M4000M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Quadro M4000M, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
20.31
+27.3%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms M4000M by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking270338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.71no data
Power efficiency10.7110.94
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameEllesmereGM204
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041,280
Core clock speed1188 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1013 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate179.078.00
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS2.496 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs14480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.31
+27.3%
M4000M 15.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7825
+27.3%
M4000M 6148

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro WX 7100 38420
+93.1%
M4000M 19892

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+25%
68
−25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.40no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+25%
35−40
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+28.8%
50−55
−28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+26.3%
35−40
−26.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+22.3%
100−110
−22.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+21%
80−85
−21%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+30.8%
50−55
−30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+14.8%
80−85
−14.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+25%
35−40
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+28.8%
50−55
−28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+26.3%
35−40
−26.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+22.3%
100−110
−22.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+21%
80−85
−21%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+30.8%
50−55
−30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+14.8%
80−85
−14.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+25%
35−40
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+26.3%
35−40
−26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+22.3%
100−110
−22.3%
Hitman 3 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+21%
80−85
−21%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+30.8%
50−55
−30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+21.1%
35−40
−21.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+14.8%
80−85
−14.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+34.1%
85−90
−34.1%
Hitman 3 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+27.3%
30−35
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+31%
27−30
−31%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+22.4%
95−100
−22.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+30.9%
80−85
−30.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and M4000M compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 25% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed M4000M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.31 15.96
Recency 10 November 2016 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 100 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 27.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

M4000M, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 55 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 145 votes

Rate Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.